A Free Template from Joomlashack

A Free Template from Joomlashack

Archive

A little bit about me

Hi. While this blog is a part of Seed Catalyst’s website, I realised over the initial few weeks that a lot of you are first introduced to the firm via the blog rather than our home page.

So to introduce myself - I’m a business consultant working with early stage technology firms to help streamline their strategy and go-to-market approach and support them for fund raising. 

With this blog, I aim to capture key market trends that I see in the industry, the ecosystem and cross-plays in some of the more interesting and upcoming sectors, as well as cover interesting companies that I meet. 

I will also be addressing vexing and interesting valuation and deal/term-sheet structures that would be of interest to technology start-ups at various stages of their growth.

So let’s get started...

Subscribe to Newsletter!

Delivered by FeedBurner

Subscribe in a Reader

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to netvibes

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to Webwag

Add to Pageflakes

Venture Capital - Money back versus positive return PDF Print E-mail
Blog - Startups
Monday, 26 April 2010 20:10
Chart of NASDAQ closing values from 1994 to 2008

 

There was a very interesting article in the Wall Street Journal recently talking about how the gap between the venture capital invested in firms and the amount they are getting sold for is narrowing.


"According to data from Dow Jones VentureSource, the median acquisition value of a venture-backed company in 2009 was $26 million, which is 1.3 times the median amount of venture capital - $19.8 million - that these companies raised in their lifetimes. That’s less than the 1.5x multiple in 2008, and well below the 3.6x experienced in 2007. In fact, it’s the smallest gap since the dark times of 2003 when the multiple sat just above 1."


The service focused firms which includes social media, dotcom and retail as well as the business and financial services focused companies haven't fared as badly but even for them the multiples are drastically down from their heydays.


Why does this matter?


It is a generally known fact that VCs do not expect block-buster deals for every one of their investments. Even they are aware that 40% will bomb, 50% will return the investment and 10% will be the super duper deals that they will be remembered for. It's the average multiple for all these transactions that is being referred to above. Hence, if the sector is only returning a 1.3x over an average investment period of 5 years, that's an IRR of about 5%, which certainly does take the venture capital industry closer to an existential crisis.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack